Dr.Abdul Wahab.drwahab2024@gmail.com
Introduction
Weight loss is a common practice among athletes, particularly
to achieve a competitive advantage in sports in the weight category. Athletes
often use progressive or fast methods to achieve their desired weight. However,
the impact of these methods on nutrition and performance is not well
understood.
Methodology
The study involved 14 male sportsmen who were selected at
random to be in either the slow weight loss (GWL) group or the quick weight
loss (RWL) group. The RWL group attempted to reduce 34 kg over 57 days, whereas
the GWL group attempted to lose 0. 5 kg every week for three weeks. Before and
after the weight reduction period, the athletes' body composition, food intake,
and performance were evaluated.
Gradual
Weight Loss (GWL)
The GWL group experienced an average weight loss of 0. 47 kg
each week over the three weeks, resulting in a total weight loss of 1. 4 kg.
This group maintained their caloric intake and Nutrient ratio while
experiencing a slight decrease in body fat mass. The GWL group's aerobic
capacity, muscular strength, and Perseverance didn't change significantly.
Rapid
Weight Loss (RWL)
The RWL group achieved a weight loss of 3.2 kg in 5-7 days,
with an average daily weight loss of 0.45 kg. This group significantly reduced
their energy intake and macronutrient consumption, leading to a loss of both
body fat and lean body mass. The RWL group showed a significant decrease in
their aerobic capacity, muscle strength, and muscle endurance.
Comparison
between GWL and RWL
This study led to significant differences between the GWL and
RWL groups in terms of nutritional intake, body composition and performance.
The RWL group had significantly lower energy absorption and Major nutrient
Ingestion compared to the GWL group. Furthermore, the RWL group weighed less
and performed better than the GWL group.
Effects on Nutrition
This study showed that rapid weight loss leads to adequate
nutrition, including carbohydrate reduction, protein and fat consumption. This
can lead to reduced muscle glycogen storage, irrgular muscle function and poor
sports performance. In contrast, little weight loss allowed for more balanced
nutrient absorption, maintaining muscle glycogen storage and sporting
performance.
Effects on
Performance
This study showed that rapid weight loss led to a significant
reduction in aerobic ability, muscle strength and muscle endurance. This can
affect sports performance, especially in sports. This requires high-strength
efforts. In the meantime, sports performance was maintained, perhaps due to the
preservation of muscle mass and glycogen storage.
Conclusion
This study determines that slow weight loss is a safer and
more effective method for athletes compared to rapid weight loss. Slow weight
loss allows for more balanced nutritional absorption, muscle mass and sporting
performance to be continues, reducing the risk of dehydration and other health
complications. On the other hand, the speed of weight loss can lead to lower
nutrient absorption, resulting in poor sports performance and increased risk of
health problems.
Practical
Applications
Trainers, athletes and nutritionists can use the results of
this study to inform their weight loss strategies. For athletes, progressive
weight loss should be recommended to achieve a competitive advantage while
simultaneously maintaining sports performance and general health.
Athletes should ensure they lose 0.5-1 kg per week on a
balanced diet that meets their energy requirements. Quick weight loss should be
avoided, especially in the days discovered, as this can affect sports
performance and increase the risk of health complications.


0 Comments